Life in General >> Current Affairs >> Poll: Is Britain a fading military Power?
Poll: Is Britain a fading military Power?
Poll: Is Britain a fading Military Power?
|
623 posts back to top |
Posted about 1 year ago BBC Radio 4 are producing a discussion programme called Reality Check, which is going to ask whether the UK should have such a large armed forces. Who now thinks it's not a good thing - or at least that it should be reduced in size, or that we should intervene less overseas? Perhaps someone is of the opinion that we've clung too long on to the idea that Britain is Great and shouldn't be spending money and lives marching around the globe...? Another idea is that we're spending too little and trying to do too much - and that we should just reign in our ambitions if we haven't got the money and conviction to be a great military nation? Any thoughts? Cooperation destroys Confrontation |
|
255 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago I was trained to Empire, trained to rule the waves, we could all be proud then, before Empire became a dirty word. We never had a large standing Army, it was out Navy that counted. Shouldn't we invest more in that? The only preference I have is swatting Muslim extremists... |
|
2092 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago This is why I HATE the media. Undermining public confidence, trust and investiment in the military at a time when we need it most. No our military is not a fading military power, we are the BEST military in the entire world, other nations and organisations look to us for training, guidence, advice and help. We are the most professional military force and are recognised as such by these nations. Just because we dont have trillions to spend on equipment and we are a small nation doesn't make us a nation that isn't great. I'm proud to serve in a military that doesn't just operate for itsself and its own interests, we are willing to help others and still operate in the same professional and efficient manner when the going gets though. Its time the media recognised this and began re-inforcing it. When did pride in your country become taboo!? Rant over (for now) Never give up, never quit, if you havent bled you haven't earnt it. |
|
20870 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago whitey14uk says ...
Nice one Whitney!!!!!!!!!!! I agree wholeheartedly!
Women should be obscene and not heard! Never regret what you have done, only what you havent!!!! |
|
1 post back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago Having served in the Forces, it sickens me the way this government is totally blind to the need for the Forces. They are blinded by the ongoing operations in Afghanistan, which of course should never be belittled. But they are forgetting that there are 2 other services besides the Army that need funding and which are taking the brunt yet again of the defence cuts. It is as usual the RAF that is taking the main hits with airbases being closed down and aircraft being taken out of service too early ie. Nimrod. Also they are again sizing down the Navy which is also a disgrace, as we are an island nation and most of our trade comes by sea. They do not see the percieved threats from terrorist organisations and rogue states. They are still living in the " oh the cold war is over and we dont need all these weapons" mind set. Well the threat is bigger now than in the cold war and with a resurrgent Russia and China building up their forces and modernising we should be doing the same. I am sick to death of these consecutive governments cutting Defence spending when they waste Billions on the NHS and Education, They really need to look to the security of this nation first before we get caught out. |
|
60 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago Some of those answers don't make sense; but I don't agree with downscaling the forces in anyway at all. A quote to take note of; "A wise man in times of peace prepares for war" - Horace. This quote should be something to go by during the times of war, not only peace time. |
|
60 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago MADMAN007 says ...
The Nimrod isn't being taken out of service completely; the MR2 has been taken out of service and the R1 soon to be once the MRA4 comes into service around 2012. The MRA4 is being tested still up at Kinloss. |
|
5487 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago I cant even begin to see how any one can justify down sizing any part of the military, as they are all vital, and all in some form or another have areas with shortages. The navy has nowhere near enough ships, in my opinion. The army, could do with more troops - not massively more but in some key areas it has got to be argued that more soldiers are needed. Similarly the air force, in my opinion needs more, in terms of Chinooks, C-17 aircraft and even personnel. Please call me TOM !!! "A man who won't die for something is not fit to live" - Martin Luther King, Jr.
|
|
20870 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago MADMAN007 says ...
Pretty harsh words there! If Billions are wasted on the NHS and Education then the same can be said for the Forces. I too served as you did and I saw money being thrown out of the window on a daily basis. If anything in my opinion, the Forces, NHS AND Education all need more funding, they all contribute to the future of the UK.
Women should be obscene and not heard! Never regret what you have done, only what you havent!!!! |
|
Account Removed 0 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago Britain has 1/5 the population of the US, so it cannot be a superpower. For that matter, Russia cannot be a superpower because of its economy and declining population. They have a lot of strategic nukes, which is the only reason they are a power at all. Under 1998 SDR, the UK would have maintained sufficient military force to be a world power: one of three nations able to wage war if need be thousands of miles from its shores;a first-rate force of nuclear fleet subs, and a credible nuclear deterrent; a large force of destroyers and frigates to patrol major sea lanes; a first-rate air force able to defend itself, and provide support to NATO or the US; a well-trained army able to take on forces almost anywhere; excellent special forces. But Gordon Brown ditched that SDR, increased spending on almost everything but defence, and gradually reduced the size of all three armed forces. The answer to the question is do the people of the UK have the will to maintain the status as a first-rate military power of the second rank(not a superpower), or do they want the nanny state to provide them with all their needs, which seem to keep multiplying. Go to the NHS for "free", get a guaranteed job, a basic education, watch the telly, etc. Its up to you. |
|
20870 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago Henke says ...
This second rank country is doing ok actually, apart from having to help bail out so-called superpowers, and to ask if we want a nanny state which provides "free" NHS, a guaranteed job and a basic education, well the answer is simple! OF COURSE WE BLOODY DO!! I sense the green eyed monster raising its head here, Britain is much closer to realising nearly all of this than any other country in Europe and to knock it is crazy, why shouldnt we have a functional society?
Women should be obscene and not heard! Never regret what you have done, only what you havent!!!! |
|
27 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago Is it me or are the Government under the illusion that we are still the British Empire. The recent budget proposed cuts to everything except foreign aid. Some of those who receive such aid are economically stronger than ourselves. Ivan WJ Quinn |
|
Account Removed 0 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago dreme says ...
|
|
20870 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago Henke says ...
Women should be obscene and not heard! Never regret what you have done, only what you havent!!!! |
|
8 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago If say Australia was to be attacked are we to stand by and do nothing, I dont't think so. We are capable of putting up to 7 million people into our Armed Forces but usually don't need much more than 300000 to 1 million. Why? because our armed forces have the aggresion and determination to win. We are slow to start but always cross the winning line somehow. We lost America because we were fighting our own people and their hearth was more in it than ours and also a large part of our army, out there, were not of us. We overcame Louis the 14th in 1700+ and 100 years later had to do the same with Napoleon and another 100 years later had to put the Kaizer down and , mainly due to the French, 20 years later had to put Hitler down, this time with some help from our USA cousins. So be proud of your country it has done some service to the world. |
|
13 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago Compared to a lot of countries, our Armed Forces are quite small...bearing in mind how many are in the services, what you have to think about is how many troops are out of the UK at any one time and what would happen if they were required here? I think that HM Forces just needs a bit more organisation and get rid of a lot of the Office dwelling jobs and just like many companies/businesses get them back out on the floor !!! Mark Evans
www.justgiving.co.uk/opwarrior |
|
2 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago Our army is the smallest it has ever been since the Napoleonic wars - the regular army went from 180,000 to 102,000 (nearly halved) during the 34 years I was in (1975-2009), and the TA was cut massively too. I am sure the RAF and RN could say much the same thing. Our armed forces, in particular the army and the Royal Marines, are overstretched year after year with harmony guidelines of 2 years pause between operational tours rarely being met for some. Cuts in manpower went too deep and some reversal of past manpower cuts is needed unless SDSR is bold and actually takes away some defence commitments. Where money needs to be saved is in the cost of procurement - one billion pounds for one destroyer to shoot down fast-jet enemy aircraft threatening the fleet - ridiculous! |
|
Account Removed 0 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago Aaaarrrggghhhhhhhhh!!! I can't believe that there were 5 people who actually believe that the Army needs to be reduced. It's okay just let my guys who are deploying once again from there friends and loved ones spend more time away risking there lives so certain people can live normal safe lives and make these type of comments. Just go home tonight and sit down in your comfy chairs, In your perfect little fish bowl of a world and remember every morning you wake up, your Army because of it's size is over committed and constantly training for deployment...Nice one you 5 individuals...Be proud! |
|
20870 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago johnny80 says ...
I agree, isnt that amazing, and that on a site thats there to support the Forces? Makes you wonder what they are doing here! What are the chances of one of the five coming forward and offering an explaination?
Women should be obscene and not heard! Never regret what you have done, only what you havent!!!! |
|
27 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago Our goverment needs to face up to the fact that some day (maybe soon!) there is going to be a conventinal war again and that we need to keep funding the Navys surface fleet and the RAF. We also need to look into the way we are funding the army, i.e the mastiffs are useful now in afganistan, but what about in 8 years (hopefully after we have left afganistan!) or so, will they be able to be used in an conventinal war? |
|
2 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago Isn't it the first duty and absolute priority of any British government to defend and protect its citizens and its country to the utmost of its ability and to do the same for British nationals and interests abroad. I think that the last time this happened was the Falklands war in 1982 and we all know just how lucky we were to get away with that one, I also think that most of us suspect it was a heaven sent political opportunity for a failing government to regain popularity!. Since 1982 we have had Iraq and Afghanistan and once again I think that politics, ego,s and popularity were the reason behind these wars and the fact that our Armed Forces were run down and ill equipped never entered the politicians heads or their conciences. When will governments realise that if you have modern well equipped powerful Armed Forces then it is not always necessary to fight, the threat is sometimes enough. A nuclear submarine in the South Atlantic in 1982 sent the Argentinian navy scuttling back to port, that action helped but the war had started, an aircraft carrier anywhere within 2000 miles of the Falkland Islands would have prevented the invasion full stop. |
|
255 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago CONIFER says ...
I didn't think it would be long before someone mentioned the Falkland's again. The question is mate, could we seriously mount another campaign if the Argies invaded again? That would be the proof of the pudding for sure. The only preference I have is swatting Muslim extremists... |
|
27 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago With the current commitment in Afghanistan, it would be hard. We could always just place trident off the coast and threaten em!:P. Nah they dont have the boats nessacary to launch it again! |
|
44 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago Think of the experience and best practice that once again has been stored up by the military - part of the issue WHY the Falklands was so successful was the military experience of MP's and personnel at the time (WW2, Palestine, Korea, Malaya, Aden, Suez, Kenya) whereas the Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan were and have been fought by ignorant individuals with no knowledge of conflict nor resolution as a result awful mistakes occurred. However, a 10+ year conflict has thrown up reform and changes atall levels and gives us a generation with experiences of professional conflict - it will stand us all in good stead over the next 30 years I believe. NOT a fading military power. |
|
112 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago oggmonster says ...
I think this makes sense. Don't we need people with experience? There are going to be more wars fought in the coming years in places like Somalia and Yemen. I read it in the papers. If I didn't have my current commitments I would have joined the Navy a long time ago but I am happy with the RNLI! I'm sorry aliens_nation_band, I don't understand what you wrote. Could you repeat please? |
|
2092 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago kathyDotFree says ...
No one knows Kathy, he won't respond and even if he did it would never be any clearer. It may sound harsh but your better off ignoring his posts, they never make sense. Never give up, never quit, if you havent bled you haven't earnt it. |
|
8367 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago With the way this government seems to want to shelf the armed forces you would certainly think the UK as a 2nd rate military force. What a disgrace and a complete let down for our troops who train hard to become the best in the world. Give us a sense of humour, Give us the grace to see a joke, To get some humour out of life, And pass it on to other folk. I'm not a complete idiot -- Some parts are just missing.
|
|
8 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago kylemore says ...
|
|
60 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago PaddyQ says ...
China being one of them. |
|
5487 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago I sounds silly to send aid to economically stronger countries (But the aid package may also from time to time be used a tool to sweeten people political powers feel we need on side, In My Opinion that is Please call me TOM !!! "A man who won't die for something is not fit to live" - Martin Luther King, Jr.
|

border=0 /


)